Showing posts with label assault. Show all posts
Showing posts with label assault. Show all posts

14 December 2013

Teen Gets 30 Years in Woodley Park Metro Stabbing

Olijawon Griffin was stabbed and killed last year.
Back in November 2012, I blogged about the murder of Olijawon Griffin at the Woodley Park Metro station:
According to the court documents, a police officer who watched Metro security footage saw Griffin engage one teen in a boxing-style fistfight shortly after 1:15 a.m. and then saw Myers sneak behind Griffin with a knife, stab him in the chest and run.
At the time, I wrote:
Myers "snuck up behind Griffin" which would tend to show deliberation and premeditation, no?
I wondered if Myers was actually culpable for first degree murder rather than second. It turns out I was right:
Myers was indicted on a charge of first-degree premeditated murder while armed and the others were indicted on felony murder. All six were indicted on charges of armed robbery, assault with a dangerous weapon, assault causing significant bodily injury and weapons offenses for their roles in attacks on Griffin and his friend...
The District of Columbia, like many other jurisdictions, allows for accomplices to be charged with murder when someone dies in the commission of another (usually dangerous felony). So while Myers's accomplices didn't actually kill Griffin (or, for that matter, are even accused of killing him), they are charged with felony murder--as if they did kill him.

The now 18-year old Chavez Myers and his friends, charged as adults, will spend a considerable amount of time in prison.

According to this article in the Washington Post, Myers pled guilty to first degree felony murder, and was sentenced to 30 years in prison. The other five accomplices, ages 17 to 20, drew sentences ranging from 15 to 19 years for voluntary manslaughter.

So Myers was indeed convicted of first degree murder, but of the felony murder variety (killing while perpetrating certain crimes, probably robbery) as opposed to the purposeful variety. In the end, the distinction is probably not meaningful--Myers will be in prison for a long time.

09 June 2013

Justice Scalia on solving crimes vs. suspicionless law-enforcement searches

"Solving unsolved crimes is a noble objective, but it occupies a lower place in the American pantheon of noble objectives than the protection of our people from suspicionless law-enforcement searches. The Fourth Amendment must prevail." 
--Justice Antonin Scalia, Maryland v. King (dissent)

03 June 2013

Best footnote ever?

From Justice Scalia's scathing dissent in Maryland v. King:
...I therefore dissent, and hope that today’s incursion upon the Fourth Amendment, like an earlier one,will some day be repudiated. 
6 Compare, New York v. Belton, 453 U. S. 454 (1981) (suspicionless search of a car permitted upon arrest of the driver), with Arizona v. Gant, 556 U. S. 332 (2009) (on second thought, no).
Nice.

Law in Plain English: Maryland v. King

This is one in a series of posts designed to describe court decisions in plain English. For more detail and background on the legal issues, see the link to the case below. For similar posts, click here.

Maryland v. King

King was arrested for assault. Pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act, which allows the state to collect DNA from those arrested for a crime of violence (as well as burglary), law enforcement collected King's DNA. Before he was tried on the assault charge (for which he was ultimately convicted), King's DNA was found to match a sample from an unsolved rape case. For this, he was indicted and convicted of rape and sentenced to life in prison. King filed a motion to suppress in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, which was denied. King then filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Special Appeals, but the Court of Appeals of Maryland (the highest court in Maryland) issued a writ of certiorari (and as a result, the case skipped the Court of Special Appeals, which is the intermediate appellate court in Maryland) and found the procedure unreasonable. The question before the Court was whether the Fourth Amendment allows the states to collect and analyze DNA from people arrested and charged (but not yet convicted) with serious crimes. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that when officers make an arrest supported by probable cause for a serious offense and bring the suspect into the station, taking a cheek swab (and analyzing) is, like fingerprinting and photographing, a reasonable police procedure under the Fourth Amendment. As a result, the Maryland Court of Appeals is reversed and the DNA evidence can be used against King.The practical impact of this decision is that police departments will be able to collect and analyze DNA from people who are arrested and charged with serious crimes.

20 November 2012

Metro murder: first or second degree?

Chavez Tyrek Myers is a 17-year-old from District Heights charged as an adult with second-degree murder while armed:
Court documents allege that he snuck up behind Griffin during a fight at the Metro station and plunged a knife into his chest.
I thought this was maybe a bit questionable--it seems like this could potentially be a first degree murder, not second? Here's the DC statute for first degree murder (emphasis in bold is mine):
§ 22-2401. Murder in the first degree - Purposeful killing; killing while perpetrating certain crimes.
 Whoever, being of sound memory and discretion, kills another purposely, either of deliberate and premeditated malice or by means of poison, or in perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate an offense punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary, or without purpose to do so kills another in perpetrating or in attempting to perpetrate any arson, as defined in § 22-401 or § 22-402, first degree sexual abuse, first degree child sexual abuse, first degree cruelty to children, mayhem, robbery, or kidnaping, or in perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate any housebreaking while armed with or using a dangerous weapon, or in perpetrating or attempting to perpetrate a felony involving a controlled substance, is guilty of murder in the first degree. For purposes of imprisonment following revocation of release authorized by § 24-203.1(b)(7), murder in the first degree is a Class A felony.
Now here is the statute for second degree murder:
§ 22-2403. Murder in the second degree.
Whoever with malice aforethought, except as provided in §§ 22-2401, 22-2402, kills another, is guilty of murder in the second degree. For purposes of imprisonment following revocation of release authorized by § 24-203.1(b)(7), murder in the second degree is a Class A felony.
Myers "snuck up behind Griffin" which would tend to show deliberation and premeditation, no? Maybe the issue here is "kills another purposely" (first degree) vs. "kills another" (second degree). It's difficult to understand the distinction here, but it seems that perhaps the prosecutors doubt their ability to prove that Myers actually intended to kill Griffin, rather than just intent to inflict a serious bodily injury that resulted in Griffin's death.

17 January 2011

Man faces attempted murder, assault charges in Pasadena stabbing

From the Baltimore Sun:
A 29-year-old Pasadena man faces attempted first-degree murder and assault charges after Anne Arundel County police said he and another man fought Sunday inside a home they share near Rock Creek Park.

According to police, officers were called about 4:30 that afternoon to the residence on the first block of Bar Harbor Road, where they found Robert Lee Still, 55, suffering from non-life-threatening stab wounds. Still told officers he and Jesse Lee Allgaier had an argument that turned physical when Allgaier attacked him with a knife and stabbed him in the upper body, then fled.

Still was taken to Maryland Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore for treatment.


View Larger Map

22 November 2010

Baltimore 11th On 'Dangerous Cities' List

These are the sorts of lists you don't want to be on. From WBAL Baltimore:
A report lists Baltimore as the 11th 'most dangerous city' in the United States.

The report, released by CQ Press, takes into account a city's murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary and motor vehicle theft rates.

St. Louis overtook Camden, N.J., as the nation's most dangerous city, according to the national study, which was released Sunday.

The study by CQ Press found St. Louis had 2,070.1 violent crimes per 100,000 residents in 2009, compared with a national average of 429.4. That helped St. Louis beat out Camden, which topped last year's list and was the most dangerous city for 2003 and 2004.

Detroit, Flint, Mich., and Oakland, Calif., rounded out the top five. For the second straight year, the safest city with more than 75,000 residents was Colonie, N.Y.

The annual rankings are based on population figures and crime data compiled by the FBI. Some criminologists question the findings, saying the methodology is unfair.

Greg Scarbro, unit chief of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program, said the FBI also discourages using the data for these types of rankings.

Baltimore ranked 12th on the CQ Press list of dangerous cities released last year.

19 November 2010

Stabbing and Attempted Robbery in Glen Burnie

According to the Anne Arundel County Police (link forthcoming):
On November 18, 2010, at approximately 3:21 p.m., officers from the Northern District responded to Baltimore Washington Medical Center for a reported stabbing and attempt robbery that occurred earlier at another location. 
            Upon arrival, officers spoke with the 50-year-old male victim from Glen Burnie, who advised that he was assaulted by three unknown suspects as he was walking near the Discount Cigarette located in the 7900 block of B&A Boulevard in Glen Burnie. The suspects approached the victim and asked him for money, but the victim relayed that he didn’t have any money. At that time, the suspects responded by pushing the victim. One of the suspects brandished a knife, swung it at the victim and struck him multiple times in the abdomen area. The suspects then fled on foot toward Albert Drive. The victim suffered minor lacerations from the incident. Several officers responded to the area to search for the suspects, but were unable to locate them. 
Suspect #1: Black male, approximately 17-19 years old, 5’10” with a medium build and braided hair, last seen wearing a black shirt, a black jacket, black jeans and white shoes
Suspect #2: Black male, approximately 17-19 years old, 5’7” with a medium build, last seen wearing a green shirt, a black jacket, black pants and white shoes
Suspect #3: Black male, approximately 17-19 years old, 5’7” with a heavy build, last seen wearing a white jacket, a black shirt, black jeans and black shoes
Andrew had almost the exact same thing happen to him at the same location a few weeks before he died; he wasn't stabbed but the assailants did have a knife.  Here is a look at the scene:



View Larger Map

14 November 2010

Three charged in Arundel Mills stabbing

Deandre Simms of Columbia
(Photo provided by AA County Police)
Keyo Allen of Columbia
(Photo provided by AA County Police)

From the Baltimore Sun:
Police have made three arrests in the Saturday night stabbing of an 18-year-old in the Arundel Mills Mall.

Anne Arundel County Police arrested two males they identified as Keyo Marlo Allen, 17, and Deandre Jamar Simms, 20, both of Columbia, and a third person identified only as a juvenile.

Allen was charged with first-degree assault and reckless endangerment. All three were also charged with second-degree assault and disorderly conduct.

The stabbing occurred at about 8:30 p.m. Saturday in the mall's food court, police said. Officers on foot patrol in the mall found the victim with a stab wound in the back. He told police he had been stabbed by someone unknown to him.

He was taken to the Maryland Shock Trauma Center in Baltimore, where he was treated and later released, police said.
This is an update to the post here.

13 November 2010

Anne Arundel County police investigate reported rape of woman in Laurel

Composite sketch
of rape suspect via
Baltimore Sun
From the Baltimore Sun:
Anne Arundel County police are investigating the reported rape of a 23-year-old woman Monday night in Laurel.

Officers responded about 7 p.m. to the 8100 block of Scenic Meadow Drive, where the victim told police she had walked behind her apartment building to throw out trash, and a man standing in nearby bushes followed her.

According to police, the man grabbed her and threatened her with a weapon before sexually assaulting her and fleeing. Officers searched the area with a K-9 unit but did not find the assailant.

Police released only a vague description of the assailant, saying the man was about six feet tall and 250 pounds with a 'chunky' build, and was wearing a maroon hooded sweatshirt with dark colored sweatpants and white shoes. The man also had facial hair and razor bumps, and may be in his early 30's, police said.

Anyone with information about the incident is asked to contact Detective Jack Hartzell of the department's sex offense unit at 410-222-3750 or county police at 410-222-8610.

18 October 2010

Police: Man killed officer over parking space

From the Baltimore Sun:
A 25-year-old Southeast Baltimore man has been charged with fatally injuring an off-duty Baltimore police detective by throwing a piece of concrete at the officer's head during an argument over a Canton parking space, according to police.

Detective Brian Stevenson, an 18-year veteran and married father of three, had gone out to have dinner on the eve of his birthday when he and Sian James got into an altercation in a private parking lot in the 2800 block of Hudson St. about 10 p.m. Saturday, police said. James was charged Sunday with first-degree murder.
This parking lot on the southeast corner at the intersection of Hudson Street and South Streeper Street in Canton, which belongs to the Mercy FamilyCare Medical office, was the scene of Detective Stevenson's death:

20 September 2010

Re: Baltimore woman, 66, killed in assault at home

An update to the 'homicide by aggravated assault' detailed here:

Man assaulted and robbed in Glen Burnie; police seek three men

From the Baltimore Sun:
Anne Arundel County police are seeking three men, at least one armed with a handgun, who are suspects in a Glen Burnie assault and robbery.

A man was walking on a foot path in the 300 block of Highland Drive just after midnight Monday when he was confronted by three men, who, with faces covered, demanded his money, according to police. After indicating that he had none, the three men assaulted the man, stole his lighter and fled on foot.

18 September 2010

Woman reports sexual assault in Odenton; suspects at large

From the Baltimore Sun:
Anne Arundel County police are searching for three men believed to have dragged a woman to a dark area where she was sexually assaulted by one of them in Odenton.

The woman told officers from the Western District that she was searching for her boyfriend in the area of Scott Lane and Saltoun Avenue when she was attacked by the men, police said.

Police said the incident occurred about 2:30 a.m. Sept. 11. She was taken to a local hospital, where she was treated and released.
Here is more from WJZ.com, including a sketch of one of the suspects.
The incident allegedly took place around 2:30 a.m. Saturday behind the Scotts Manor Apartments.  The victim told police she was approached by three men who dragged her into a dark area.  She says one of the men then sexually assaulted her.
"Described as a white male about 5'7" to 5'10", brown hair, gray sweatshirt and blue jeans with a one inch scar on his left cheek," Mulcahy said.
Another suspect is described as a white male who's about 5'7".

Baltimore woman, 66, killed in assault at home

From the Baltimore Sun:
A 66-year-old woman died Friday in what police called a 'homicide by aggravated assault' after being found with head injuries at a West Baltimore home. A female relative was described as a 'person of interest' in the case.

Officers responding to a call from a home in the 1500 block of North Stricker Street at 7:50 p.m. Friday arrived to find Cecelia Mitchell suffering from head trauma, police Det. Jeremy Silbert said.

Mitchell, whose address had not been determined, was taken to Maryland Shock Trauma Center, Silbert said. She died of her injuries at 8:37 p.m., he said.

'It appears there was some sort of argument in the house, and that's when the victim was struck on the head with some sort of blunt object,' Silbert said.

14 September 2010

Re: Assault in Harlem Park

An update to last night's post from the Baltimore Sun:

A man was in critical condition Monday night after he was badly beaten in West Baltimore, city police said.
Officers received a call at 9:10 p.m. for a man being assaulted and lying in the street in the 900 block of Bennett Place, according to police, in the Harlem Park community.
A medical crew was already treating the man, who appeared to approximately 40 years old, when officers arrived.
He was admitted to a local hospital with severe head and face trauma, police said.

06 September 2010

Police recover hand guns and a grenade in connection to an August home invasion

UPDATE: FOX45 Baltimore is reporting the address as Westridge Road (not Westgate Road), which makes sense since there doesn't appear to be a 6800 block of Westgate Road.

From ABC2 News:
The Baltimore County Police are reporting that they have arrested a suspect who had been wanted in connection to a home invasion in mid-August.

Police spokesman Lt. Robert McCullough says that 32-year-old Lavar Maurice Rich was apprehended Monday afternoon in the 4500 block of Fairfax Road by Baltimore County Police who received assistance from Baltimore City Police.

Police had been searching for Rich after he was believed to have been in possession of multiple hand guns, an assault rifle, and a hand grenade following the August 19th incident in the 6800 block of Westgate Road.

Earlier in the day, McCullough says police officers were able to recover two hand guns and one hand grenade at an undisclosed location at Windsor Forest Apartments on Windsor Mill Road.

...

22 October 2006

60 Minutes: Duke rape case, part 5 of 6

(CBS) Without the DNA evidence he had hoped for, the D.A. needed the accuser to identify the three men who had raped her. Days after the party, she was shown photo lineups of 36 lacrosse players and didn’t pick out anyone as her attacker. In fact, she didn’t recognize David Evans at all, and was fairly certain only that she had seen Reade Seligmann somewhere at the party. So, two weeks later, the D.A. supervised another line-up, this one showing mugshots of all 46 white players on the team.

"It felt like Russian roulette," Seligmann recalls. "It could have been any single one of us. Kids were even calculating their chances of what the percentage was that you would get picked."

This time, Seligmann did get picked. The accuser said she was 100 percent sure he looked like the person who had forced her to perform oral sex. But Seligmann says that’s impossible, and that he has hard evidence to prove it. Cell phone records show that right after the accuser stopped dancing at the party, Seligmann made nine separate calls over the next nine minutes. The last call was to a taxi company, which picked him up a few minutes later.

Asked why he left when he did, Seligmann says, "I didn't like the tone of the party, and I just, it made me uncomfortable. It's as simple as that. I thought it was a boring party and I didn’t like the tone."

A few minutes later, he was captured on a bank security camera withdrawing cash from an ATM. The taxi driver says they then stopped off at a take-out restaurant, and by 12:46 a.m., Reade Seligmann was back in his dorm.

Seligmann says based on that evidence, it couldn't have been him. "It's impossible. It's impossible for it to have happened," he tells Bradley.

Seligmann says his lawyer offered to present proof of his whereabouts to authorities, but said they didn’t want to hear it.

He says he never once talked to the police about the night. Seligmann says he was never interviewed by police or anyone from the district attorney's office about what happened that night.

The accuser also identified Collin Finnerty in the final photo lineup, saying he raped and sodomized her. Finnerty says he wasn’t there when a rape could have happened, and says he will wait until trial to provide specific documentation that he also left the party early.

Asked when he left the party, Finnerty tells Bradley, "I left soon after I saw them do their act in the room with everybody else. I saw them leave the room. I never saw them again in my life."

As for David Evans, when the accuser saw his photograph for a third time, having been unable to recognize him before, she said she was 90 percent sure Evans had raped her – but, she added, the man who raped her had a mustache.

But Evans maintains he did not have a mustache that night. "Absolutely not. And, I tried to provide the district attorney with photographs showing that I didn't, and he refused to view them," he says.

Still, the players were indicted, based largely on the results from that final photo line-up. How did that happen?

60 Minutes asked James Coleman, a prominent law professor at Duke University Law School who helped establish guidelines in North Carolina designed to protect against false identifications in police line-ups. He says this line-up broke one basic principle: there were no “filler” photos, no pictures of people not connected to the case. The accuser only saw photos of lacrosse players who police told her were at the party.

"If she’s told all of these people who were considered suspects were at the party, so you pick three and we’ll indict those three," Coleman says.

"So she can’t make a mistake," Bradley remarks.

"Can’t make a mistake," Coleman replies.

Professor Coleman says the line-up ordered by the D.A. for the Duke lacrosse case violated local, state and federal guidelines. The D.A. has been quoted as saying that will be up to a judge to decide.

Asked why a district attorney would order a line-up that breaks virtually every rule in the book, Coleman says, "Well that's a good question for the D.A. But I assume that, you know after his initial performance, in this case, he needed to indict at least three players. And charge them with what he said was a rape that had occurred."

So, what is the evidence that suggests a rape did occur? The district attorney, Mike Nifong, who has repeatedly declined 60 Minutes' requests for an interview, told a local reporter the evidence could be found in the medical reports.

"My reading from the emergency room nurse would indicate that some sort of sexual assault did in fact take place," he said.

Link

21 October 2006

60 Minutes: Duke rape case, part 4 of 6

(CBS) Roberts says the three indicted players never used racial epithets. The three players fear they will be punished unfairly for the sins of some of their teammates.

"If that comment was said, it's disgusting. And there's no way I can defend that. You know, that's a horrible thing for anyone to say. It's just, I couldn't even imagine saying it and, I'm not gonna be accountable for, you know, another person's, you know, unbelievably horrible remarks. I won't. I won't, you know, accept responsibility for that, 'cause I would never do it myself," Seligmann says.

Seligmann says he also won’t accept responsibility for a rape he didn’t commit. And he says he can prove it.

Faced with a claim from a black woman that she had been brutally attacked and sexually assaulted at a party of white Duke lacrosse players, the Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong, in the midst of a tough election campaign, aggressively moved to build his case. Evidence was collected, there were tests and photo lineups and three players who were at the party were indicted. Many people at Duke, in Durham and around the country were quick to judge the players, believing that the team was covering up a crime.

But based on 60 Minutes' six-month review of the case file, it appears that standard police procedures were violated and evidence disregarded – evidence that may have pointed toward the players’ innocence.

From the beginning, David Evans says he did everything he could to cooperate with authorities – starting soon after the party when Durham police turned up at his house with a search warrant and rousted him from his sleep.

"It was scary. I woke up from a nap to ten police officers in my living room with a search warrant," he recalls. "As they read the search warrant I went through every part of it – told 'em where they could find things and that we'd fully cooperate and answer any questions they had."

Asked what he thought would happen next, Evans says, "I'd done everything that I thought I could do. I put my faith in the legal system and told them what happened. I gave my statement. I offered to take a polygraph, I gave my DNA over. I don't know what else I could do."

Still, investigators believed the entire lacrosse team had something to hide. So, the district attorney’s office asked a judge to order all 46 white players to provide their DNA – there was one black player on the team. Prosecutors promised it would “immediately rule out any innocent persons and show conclusive evidence as to who the suspects” were.

Collin Finnerty says the players were happy to oblige and says they weren't nervous.

"I mean, we were kinda, I mean, shocked by the fact that we – that we had to actually go to a police station to give DNA. But everyone – we were told it would help to clear everything up. So we were happy to go," Finnerty explains.

They were even happier when the results came back: there was no match. No DNA from any member of the lacrosse team was found on or inside the accuser or on her clothing. Reade Seligmann thought the case would now be closed, but he was wrong.

"It’s so frustrating because that was an opportunity for us to exonerate ourselves, and we were told that," he says. "We trusted that you know if we cooperated, we would, you know, those that were innocent would be shown to be innocent. And that's just, it didn't play out that way."

District Attorney Mike Nifong, who had declared that DNA would be the crux of his case, played down the results, speculating that the absence of DNA meant that the attackers may have used condoms, although the accuser had already stated that there were “no condoms used”, and that at least one of her three attackers had ejaculated inside her. Although it was a major setback for his case, the D.A. said he was undeterred.

"For most of the years I’ve been doing this we didn’t have DNA. We had to deal with sexual assault cases the good old-fashioned way – witnesses got on the stand and told what happened to them," Nifong stated.

Link